Determining Nearest Point of Complete Relief
The diagram below gives you an idea of how to assess the Nearest Point of Complete Relief from an Abnormal Course Condition using relief from a Cart Path as an example.
But what if you are physically unable to determine the NPCR because of, for example, the trunk of a tree, a boundary fence, or a boundary wall?
The diagram below illustrates the point where a right-handed player may be unable to determine the nearest point of complete relief from an immovable obstruction and will need to estimate the point under Rule 16. Also see the Definition of Nearest Point of Complete Relief.
But golf is a test of playing ability and is the same for everyone, but some can be more adept at playing shots than others, or more inventive, so long as a stroke is not unreasonable.
In the diagram above there are several options for a right-handed player:
- There is no rule that prevents a player from standing Out of Bounds or on a Boundary Wall to play a stroke at a ball that is in play on the course.
- A player may strike the ball with the face of a club if he stands with his back to the direction of play and plays the ball backwards from the side of his shoe, not standing astride the line of play, in a reverse Croquet Style stroke. There would be no Free Relief for this type of stroke because it is not a recognised as reasonable as the player could strike the wall first in making the stroke.
If a player is looking for Free Relief, then s/he may make a stroke at a ball with the back of a club, which would be regarded as a left-handed stroke.
This is an acceptable stroke and so the player would be entitled to Free Relief from the Cart Path as a Left-handed Player.
Once the reference point has been ascertained and relief has been taken and the ball dropped, the player may continue playing her/his left-handed stroke or if the lie of the ball now allows him to be able to take a stance in an area where he has complete relief from the Cart Path, so not standing on the Cart Path, then he may continue play in any direction he wishes.
See Rule 16.1a
Obstruction Interfering with Abnormal Stroke May Not Preclude Player From Taking Relief
In some situations, a player may have to adopt an abnormal swing, stance or direction of play in playing his or her ball to accommodate a given situation. If the abnormal stroke is not clearly unreasonable given the circumstances, the player is permitted to take free relief under Rule 16.1.
For example, in the general area, a right-handed player’s ball is so close to a boundary object on the left side of a hole that he or she must make a left-handed swing to play towards the hole. In making the left-handed swing, the player’s stance is interfered with by an immovable obstruction.
The player is allowed relief from the immovable obstruction since use of a left-handed swing is not clearly unreasonable in the circumstances.
After the relief procedure for the left-handed swing is complete, the player may then use a normal right-handed swing for the next stroke. If the obstruction interferes with the right-handed swing, the player may take relief for the right-handed swing under Rule 16.1b or play the ball as it lies.
Player May Not Use Clearly Unreasonable Stroke to Get Relief from Condition
A player may not use a clearly unreasonably stroke to get relief from an abnormal ground condition. If the player’s stroke is clearly unreasonable given the circumstances, relief under Rule 16.1 is not allowed, and he or she must either play the ball as it lies or take unplayable ball relief.
For example, in the general area, a right-handed player’s ball is in a bad lie. A nearby immovable obstruction would not interfere with the player’s normal right-handed stroke, but would interfere with a left-handed stroke. The player states that he or she is going to make the next stroke left-handed and believes that, since the obstruction would interfere with such a stroke, Rule 16.1b allows relief.
However, since the only reason for the player to use a left-handed stroke is to escape a bad lie by taking relief, use of the left-handed stroke is clearly unreasonable and the player is not allowed to take relief under Rule 16.1b (Rule 16.1a(3)).
The same principles would apply to the use of a clearly unreasonable stance, direction of play or the choice of a club.
Another situation is shown below when your ball lies close to a cart path. There is no interference by the cart path for a stroke towards the green, but you cannot play towards the green from where your ball lies because of intervention by the tree.